Get alerts of updates about «Effectiveness of Microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia»

How often would you like to receive alerts from fhi.no? (This affects all your alerts)
Do you also want alerts about:

The email address you register will only be used to send you these alerts. You can cancel your alerts and delete your email address at any time by following the link in the alerts you receive.
Read more about the privacy policy for fhi.no

You have subscribed to alerts about:

  • Effectiveness of Microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Health technology assessment

Effectiveness of Microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Published

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health was commissioned to summarize key findings from systematic reviews about the difference in effectiveness of Microwave Thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Forside TUMT.jpg

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health was commissioned to summarize key findings from systematic reviews about the difference in effectiveness of Microwave Thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Les på norsk
Facebook Twitter Send by e-mail
Kan lastes ned som pdf. På norsk. Engelsk sammendrag.

About this publication

  • Year: 2020
  • By: Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • Authors Dalsbø TK, Fretheim A.
  • ISBN (digital): 978-82-8406-139-9
Order

Download:

Key message

The Norwegian Institute of Public Health was commissioned to summarize key findings from systematic reviews about the difference in effectiveness of Microwave Thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP) for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

We identified one systematic review including six randomised controlled studies. Briefly, the results showed that:

  • There may be little or no difference in prostata symptom score (IPSS) improvement between TUMT and TURP .
  • TURP may be better in improving dysuria, urinary retention, urin flow and prostate problems (AUA and Madsen-Iversen score) than TUMT .
  • TUMT may perform better than TURP on the outcomes retrograde ejaculation and blood in the urine.
  • TUMT probably reduces the proportion of patients experiencing TURP syndrome, strictures or blood transfusion, as compared to TURP.
  • It is uncertain whether there is a difference between TURP and TUMT measured in clot retention, re-treatment, erectile dysfunction or incidence of urinary tract infection.

Comparisons of  TUMT and TURP are ambiguous. Some results seem to favour TURP whereas others favour TUMT. All results are associated with uncertainty, and we generally haw low to moderate confidence in the evidence.